AMIYA KUMAR MUKHERJI, P.N.MUKHERJEE
SAILENDRA NATH GHOSAL – Appellant
Versus
ENA DUTT – Respondent
( 2 ) THE constitutional validity of the above sub-section 3a has been challenged before us on the ground that it offends Articles 14 and 19 (1) (f) of the Constitution. It has been contended further that, even if the said provision be not ultra vires in itself, it will be ultra vires under the said articles, when read with Section 13, as Section 13 of the Amending Act makes provisions of sub-section (3a) (Section 4 of the Amending Act) restrospective and applicable to pending suits and appeals.
( 3 ) IT is contended on behalf of the landlords that the impugned sub-Section is ultra vires under Article 14 of the Constitution as classification of landlords into owner-landlords and transferee-landlords is arbitrary and not a rational classification and has no nexus to the object, sought to be achieved by the amendmen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.