SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Cal) 123

BOROOAH, AJAY KUMAR BASU
S. N. CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
BIMALENDU MAZUMDAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARESH BHATTACHARJI, K.B.ROY, S.N.BANERJEE

AJAY K. BASU, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a Rule issued by our learned brothers R. N. Dutt and K. K. Mitra. JJ. under Contempt of Court's Act against the opposite party B. Mazumdar alia Baima-lendu Majumdar, M, A. , B. L. . Court Inspector. Barrackpore. for contempt of Shri Sailendra Nath Chakrabortv, Magistrate, 1st Class. Barrackpore, as reported to this Hon'ble Court.

( 2 ) PURSUANT to the direction of this court the alleged contemnor B-Majumdar appeared in person before us and showed cause through his Advocate Sri. K. B. Roy.

( 3 ) THE short facts leading to the Rule are as follows : the said Magistrate Sailendra Nath Chakraborty insisted that Court Inspectors must use cartridge or conquest papers in their petitions intended to be filed before the said court. But as the police fund did not permit such expenditure the Court Inspectors could not use such papers in their petitions before the said court and for that the Court Inspector alleged to have incur-red the displeasure of the said Magistrate. This will be evident from An-nexures C and D. The learned Magistrate has taken strong exceptions to the two communications one dt. 1-4-1970. (Annexure A) and another dated 6-7-1970 (Annexure B










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top