SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Cal) 254

SARMA SARKAR, S.K.CHAKRAVARTY
BRITISH PAINTS (INDIA) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hrishikesh Ganguly, P.K.SENGUPTA, RABINDRA MOHAN MUKHERJEE, SUPROKASH BANERJI

S. K. CHAKRAVARTI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is at the instance of the plaintiff in a suit for damages for breach of contract against the Union of India. The Union of India invited tenders for the supply of paints of the description compound recolouring Olive Green Scamic 314 for faded tents to Specification Ind/ 32/7037. The plaintiff offered a tender being sample No. 30/100. The laboratory did not consider the sample to be upto the mark, but the higher authorities of the Defence Department accepted this tender, and placed an order with the plaintiff for supply of 500 Cwt. of this article and the price was fixed at Rs. 256/-F. O. R. Calcutta per Cwt. According to the contract the goods were to be inspected by the Inspector at Calcutta, and if he was satisfied that these were upto the mark, then the same could be despatched by the plaintiff on receipt of the inspection notes. The original date of delivery was fixed on 15th of October, 1952, but the plaintiff stated that it might not be in a position to do so as it had to indent some of the ingredients from U K. , and on their successive applications for extension of time, time for supply was finally extended upto the 30th of April 1953












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top