SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Cal) 93

SANKAR PRASAD MITRA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
BIRLA GWALIOR P. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.GUPTA, B.L.PAL, D.PAL, R.C.DE, R.P.Murarka

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference under Section 66 (2) or the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for determination of the following question :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the sum of rupees one lakh, eleven thousand, seven hundred and seventy-nine, said to have been forgone by the assessee as managing agency commission was allowable as a revenue expenditure under Section 10 (2) (xv) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, for the assessment year 1954-55? "

( 2 ) THE assessment year concerned in this reference is 1954-55, the corresponding previous year being the financial year ended 31st March, 1954. The assessee, the Birla Bros. (Gwalior) Ltd. (now Birla Gwalior Private Ltd.), is a private limited company and acts as managing agents of several other limited liability companies. Under the managing agency agreement between the assessee-company and the managed company, the assessee-company was entitled to receive a commission @ 12 1/2 per cent. on the net profits of the managed company together with a sum of Rs. 18,000 for office allowance. The accounting year of both the managed company and the managing agents ended on the 31st of March, each ye

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top