SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 270

G.K.Mitter, S.A.Masud
Rungta Sons (P) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sankar Ghosh, R.N. Gupta, B.L. Pal, B. Gupta

Judgment

1. IN this reference under s. 66(1) of the IT Act 1922, the following two questions of law have been referred to us :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, office allowance receivable by the company from the managed companies was income of the company for the year 1954-55 even though it was surrendered by a resolution passed before the end of the accounting period?

2.Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, managing agency commission and officer allowance received by the assessee-company from M. G. R. Iron and Steel Works Ltd. was income of the assessee-company for the asst. yr. 1954-55 even though it was surrendered by the assessee-company, just because the resolution surrendering the commission and the allowance was passed after the end of the accounting period?"

2. THESE questions have arisen under the following circumstances : The assessee is a private limited company managing other companies as managing agents and also doing business in minerals. The assessment year in question is 1954-55 and the corresponding previous year is 2010 Ratha Jatra ending on 11th July, 1953. The assessee-company was entitled to office allowance and


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top