HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA
A. N. Sen
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR, HIGH COURT, CALCUTTA - Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, WEST BENGAL - Respondent
Company Petn. 208 Of 1960
Decided On : APRIL 25, 1969
The Income-tax Authorities are competent to commence or continue an assessment proceeding against a company in liquidation without obtaining leave of Court.
Fact of the Case:
The Official Liquidator of a company in liquidation filed an application before the High Court, complaining about the conduct of the Income-tax Department in issuing notices for assessment of the company without obtaining leave of Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 and prayed for suitable orders quashing the said notices and restraining the Department from taking any steps in enforcement thereof without obtaining leave of Court.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the Income-tax Authorities are competent to commence or continue an assessment proceeding against a company in liquidation without obtaining leave of Court.
Issues: Whether the Income-tax Authorities are competent to commence or continue an assessment proceeding against a company in liquidation without obtaining leave of Court.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Section 446 (1) of the Companies Act, 1956 should be construed with reference to other sections of the Act and the general scheme of administration of the assets of the company in liquidation. 2. No narrow construction should be placed upon the words 'other legal proceeding' in Section 446 (1) and leave of Court will generally be necessary in respect of any proceeding against a company in liquidation, if the proceeding itself is directed against the estate or effects of the company in liquidation, unless it is, otherwise, specifically provided. 3. If the proceeding against the company in liquidation be such as not to affect by itself the assets and properties of the company in liquidation and be of such a nature which the Court, notwithstanding the exclusive jurisdiction conferred on it by Sub-section (2) of Section 446, is not in a position to entertain or dispose of, leave of Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act will not be necessary to commence or continue such proceeding against the company in liquidation and such proceedings cannot be construed to be included within 'the other legal proceeding' referred in Section 446 (1) of the Companies Act 1956.
Final Decision: The application filed by the Official Liquidator was dismissed and there was no order as to costs. The Liquidator was allowed to retain his own costs of the application out of the assets of the company in his hands.
( 1 ) THIS application raises a question of law of some importance. The question is whether the Income-tax Authorities are competent to commence or continue an assessment proceeding against a company in liquidation without obtaining leave of Court.
( 2 ) BY an order made by this Court on the 16th of June, 1961, the company went into liquidation and the Official Liquidator was appointed Liquidator of the company. The company is now in the process of being wound up by this Court. The Official Liquidator of the company has been served with several notices of assessment in respect of the company by the Income-tax Authorities. He has been served with a notice under Section 142 (I) of Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of assessment year 1964-65 and he has also received notices under Section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of assessment years 1965-68, 1966-67 and 1967-68. All these notices are in respect of periods subsequent to the date of the winding up order. These notices have all been issued by the Income-tax Department (which is also hereinafter referred, to as the Department) without obtaining any leave of Court. The Official Liquidator has taken out the present summons, complaining to Court about the conduct of the Department in issuing the said notices without obtaining leave of Court under Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 and has asked 'that the proceedings under Sections 142 (1) and 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, initiated by the Income-tax Authorities against the company be stayed. '
( 3 ) SECTION 142 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 deals with enquiry before assessment and Section 142 (1) provides as follows :" (1) For the purpose of making an assessment under this Act, the Income-tax Officer may serve on any person who has made a return under Section 139 or upon whom a notice has been served under Sub-section (2) of Section 139 (whether a return has been made or not) a notice requiring Mm, on a date to be therein specified,-- (i) to produce, or cause to be produced, such accounts or documents as the Income-tax Officer may require, or (ii) to furnish in writing and verified in the prescribed manner information in such form and on such points or matters (including a statement or all assets and liabilities of the assessee, whether included in the account or not) as the Income-tax Officer may require : provided that-- (a) the previous approval of the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner shall be obtained before requiring the assessee, to furnish a statement of all assets and liabilities not included in the accounts; (b) the Income-tax Officer shall not require the production of any accounts relating to a period more than three years prior to the previous year. "
( 4 ) SECTION 148 of the said Act provides for issue of notice where income has escaped assessment and the said section reads :"148 (1 ). Before making the assessment, reassessment or recomputation under Section 147, the Income-tax Officer shall serve on the assessee a notice containing all or any of the requirements which may be included in a notice under Sub-section (2) of Section 139; and the provisions of this Act shall so far as may be, apply accordingly as if the notice were a notice issued under that sub-section. (2) The Income-tax Officer shall, before issuing any notice under this section, record his reasons for doing so. "
( 5 ) SECTION 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 referred to both in Sections 142 and 148 deals with procedure for assessment and may also be quoted. "139. Return ot Income -- (1) Every person, if his total income or the total income of any other person in respect of which he is assessable under mis Act during the previous year exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, shall furnish a return of his income or the income of such other person during the previous year in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed-- (a)
Lalji Haridas v. State of Maharashtra
Damji Valji Shah v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Union of India v. Seth Spinning Mills Ltd. (in liquidation)
S.K.G. Sugar Ltd. v. Ali Hassan
R.G.N. Price v. M. Chandrasekharan
B.V. John v. Coir Yarn and Textile Ltd.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.