SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Cal) 54

P.B.MUKHARJI, K.L.RAY
SHAMSUN NEHAR MANSUR – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF ESTATE DUTY, W. B. I. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MOTILAL, B.L.PAL, D.GUPTA, J.C.PAL

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a problem in Estate Duty, under the Estates Duty Act. The reference is made under Section 64 (1) of the Estate Duty Act by the Central Board of Direct Taxes and raises the following question to be answered by the Court:--"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the value of the house property No. 33 Apcar Garden, was correctly included in the principal value of the estate of the deceased, as property passing or deemed to pass on his death?"

( 2 ) THE property is a house property No. 33 Apcar Garden, Asansol. The title deed of this property, a copy of which has been produced by the Revenue Authorities and which is directed to be kept as part of the records of this proceeding, is an Indenture of Conveyance dated the 21st February, 1947. At the outset it must be said, this is not at all or by any means or by the remotest suggestion a Deed of Gift by the husband to the wife. This is a document of sale where the vendor Henry Earnest Cecil Grant of Asansol was selling this property to Begum Shamsun Nehar Mansur, This Deed of sale recites the consideration to be Rs. 20,000/ -. It also states clearly that the whole of this money or consi






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top