BIJAYESH MUKHERJI
EASTERN COAL CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUNIL KUMAR ROY – Respondent
( 1 ) BY this application the plaintiff, the Eastern Coal Co. , Ltd. , asks for amendment of the plaint presented and admitted on July 10, 1956.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff company went into a members' voluntary liquidation on June 26, 1958. And the amendment asked for seeks to incorporate that only, in the plaint, in suitable terms.
( 3 ) THE first attempt to defeat such amendment is rested on section 446 of the Companies Act, 1 of 1956, by which, amongst other things, all proceedings that pend in a court other than the Company Court, have got to be transferred to the Company Court, when a winding-up order has been made. When, however, it is pointed out that what bulks large here is a case of members' voluntary winding-up, not a winding-up by the Court or subject to the supervision of the Court, and that section 489 does not list section 446 as one of the sections applicable to a members' voluntary winding-up, the attempt is given up, it being conceded that section 446 is irrelevant in the context. Indeed, occurring as it does under the Company Act's Part VII, Chapter II captioned 'winding-up by Court,' it can, without more, do no duty here: a case of voluntary wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.