SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 196

D.BASU
ABANI BHUSAN BISWAS – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTHAN CABLES LTD. , BURDWAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GOPAL NARAIN, H.CHAKRAVORTY, Kalyanbrata Ray, PROSANTO KUMAR GHOSE

D. BASU, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is an employee of Respondent No. 1, the Hindusthan Cables Ltd. (Annexure A to the petition), a Government of India Undertaking, 'owned' by the Central Government within the meaning of Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956, in which the Central Government is the sole shareholder

( 2 ) ON 29-11-63, the petitioner, a Driver-cum-Mechanic was suspended by the Administrative Officer of respondent No. 1 by tht order at Annexure B to the Petition. In this order, it was alleged that the petitioner was guiltv of 'insubordination and disobedience' to orders issued by his superior authority and was accordingly considered 'undesirable' to be retained in the service of the company. On 2-12-63, the Administrative Authority served the charge-sheet at Annexure C to the petition and asked the petitioner to show cause why disciplinary action should not be taken against him on the charge of misconduct comprising of-- (i) Wilful insubordination or disobedience to superior order; (ii) Negligence of work; (iii) Habitual indiscipline and misbehaviour

( 3 ) SHRI S. Bhattacharyya was appointed the Enquiry Officer and on the report of that Officer, the petitioner was asked










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top