SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Cal) 163

B.N.BANERJEE, K.L.RAY
KANAN DEVAN HILLS PRODUCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH-TAX, CALCUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D.PAL, GOURI MITRA, S.MUKHERJEE

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference, under Section 27 (1) of the Wealth-tax Act, at the instance both of the assessee and the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, has been made in the following circumstances.

( 2 ) THE assessee is a Sterling Company, incorporated in Great Britain, and is a manufacturer of tea grown in Its own gardens in India.

( 3 ) FOR the assessment year 1957-51 (the relevant valuation date being November 30 1956 ). the assessee claimed that (a) sum of Rs. 51,81,588, representing the value of residential quarters occupied by the employees and labourers of the assessee. (b) a sum of Rs. 11,93,222, representing the value of electric machinery (non-factory), (c) a sum of Rs. 3,58,996. representing the value of stationary wire ropes and crab winches, tubewells, water-supply plant, grinding machines and vehicles of conveyance and (d) a sum of Rs. 76,30,365. representing the amount of taxation liability not actually assessed before the valuation date, should be excluded from the value of the wealth of the assessee, respectively under Sections 2 (e) (ii ). 5 (1) (ix) and 2 (m) of the Wealth-tax Act.

( 4 ) THE Wealth-tax Officer disallowed the claim. The assessee appealed befor



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top