SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Cal) 2

B.N.BANERJEE
NANI GOPAL PAUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Mittal, B.K.PANDEY, D.GUPTA, R.C.DE

B. N. BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) IN exercise of the powers under Sub-rules (2) and (3) of Rule 125 of the Defence of India Rules 1962, the Governor of West Bengal made an order known as the "west Bengal Chhana Sweets Control Order 1965" (hereinafter referred to as the Control Order ). The object of the control order is, as stated in the preamble, the maintenance of supplies and equitable distribution of milk. The order was published in an Extra-ordinary issue of the Calcutta Gazette, on August 23, 1965, and three days thereafter the petitioner disputed the validity of the order and obtained this Rule.

( 2 ) IT is necessary for me to notice the relevant provisions of the Control Order at this stage. Clause (2) of the Control Order is the definition clause. Under Clause 2 (b), "chhana means a product obtained through coagulation of milk followed by draining off the whey. " Under Clause 2 (c)"chhana sweets mean sweets of any kind containing Chhana as one of the ingredients but does not include the variety of sweets commonly known as Rasogolla, Pantua (Ladykene) Cham-Cham, Khirmohan and Langcha. "the definition includes a variety of Chhana sweets called "sandesh", which is well known to the























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top