B.N.BANERJEE
NANI GOPAL PAUL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) IN exercise of the powers under Sub-rules (2) and (3) of Rule 125 of the Defence of India Rules 1962, the Governor of West Bengal made an order known as the "west Bengal Chhana Sweets Control Order 1965" (hereinafter referred to as the Control Order ). The object of the control order is, as stated in the preamble, the maintenance of supplies and equitable distribution of milk. The order was published in an Extra-ordinary issue of the Calcutta Gazette, on August 23, 1965, and three days thereafter the petitioner disputed the validity of the order and obtained this Rule.
( 2 ) IT is necessary for me to notice the relevant provisions of the Control Order at this stage. Clause (2) of the Control Order is the definition clause. Under Clause 2 (b), "chhana means a product obtained through coagulation of milk followed by draining off the whey. " Under Clause 2 (c)"chhana sweets mean sweets of any kind containing Chhana as one of the ingredients but does not include the variety of sweets commonly known as Rasogolla, Pantua (Ladykene) Cham-Cham, Khirmohan and Langcha. "the definition includes a variety of Chhana sweets called "sandesh", which is well known to the
Automobile Transport (Rajasthan) Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan
Khyerbari Tea Co. Ltd. v. State of Assam
State of Bombay v. Chamarbaugwala
Md.Yasin v. Town area Committee Jalalabad
Narendra Kumar v. Union of India
King Emperor v. Shibnath Banerjee
New Central Jute Mills Co.Ltd. v. Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Finance
REFERRED TO : Atiabari Tea Co.Ltd. v. State of Assam
Firm Mentab Majid and Co. v. State of Madras
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.