SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(All) 82

JAGDISH SAHAI, T.RAMABHADRAN
SHOBHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S.SARAN, T.N.SINHA

JAGDISH SAHAI, J.


( 1 ) ON being convicted under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 for contravening rule 3 of the U. P. Paddy (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the order) by a Magistrate, the petitioners appealed before the learned Sessions Judge, Varanasi but their appeal was dismissed on 14th of April, 1961 by Sri P. S. Varma, II Temporary Civil and sessions Judge, Varanasi. Thereafter the present revision application was filed in this Court under Section 439 Cri. P. C. The matter came up before our brother Broome. The submission that was made before him on behalf of the petitioners was that the provisions of the Order and specially those of Clause 3 are ultra vires. On behalf of the State reliance was placed upon State of U. P. v. Ram Charan, 1962 all LJ 13 : (AIR 1962 All 359) where a Division Bench of this Court had held the provisions of the U. P. Wheat (Restriction on Movement) Order, 1949 to be intra vires. Broome; J. was of the opinion that there was a suggestion in 1962 All LJ 13 : (AIR 1962 All 359) (supra) that the matter requires further consideration. He also considered the instant case to be, to some extent, distinguisha



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top