SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Cal) 189

AMARESH ROY, S.N.BAGCHI
MANNALAL KHATIC – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajoy Kumar Basu, Bejoy Kumar Bhose, BOLIN BASU, P.C.BAROAH

BAGCHI, J.

( 1 ) THE accused-appellant Mannalal Khatic stood a trial, charged with two counts of distinct offence, viz. under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, for having committed murder of Gulab, and under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code for having caused hurt to Dayaram with a sharp-cutting weapon, at tie Third Criminal Sessions of 1963 in me Original Criminal Jurisdiction of the Calcutta High Court before the Hon'ble Mr. Justice T. P. Mukherjee and a Special Jury. Of the nine jurors, six found Mannalal Khatic, the accused-appellant guilty on the charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for murdering Gulab and seven founds Mannalal Khatic, the accused-appellant guilty for having caused hurt to Dayaram with a sharp-cutting weapon. The learned Judge agreeing with and accepting the majority verdict of the Jury on both the charges against the accused-appellant Mannalal Khatic, convicted and sentenced him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and under Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code rigorous imprisonment for three years respectively, the latter sentence to run concurrency with the former one.

( 2 ) THE accused-ap





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top