SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 193

H.K.BOSE, B.C.MITRA
INDIRA DEBI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B.Mitter, CHANDRA NATH MUKHERJI, N.C.CHAKRAVARTI, R.CHAUDHARY

B. C. MITRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against a judgment and order of Laik, J. dated December 23, 1964, whereby a rule nisi obtained by the appellants in an application under Article 226 of the Constitution, was discharged.

( 2 ) CERTAIN plots of land recorded in Khatian No. 140 of Mouza Dwarir Jangal in the district of 24 Parganas and included in the Revisional Record of Rights formed part of the property owned by one Rajendra Chandra Banerjee, since deceased. The said Revisional Record of Rights was prepared under the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The appellants are the executors of the will of the said deceased. In course of the administration of the estate of the deceased, the appellants made various settlements of the said land and in the Record of Rights as finally published, the names of the tenants were duly recorded. It is alleged that the lands recorded in the said Khatian No. 140 were settled by the appellants, as executors of the Estate of the deceased, with one Jayanta Kumar Banerjee, long before the vesting of the estates under the provisions of the Act.

( 3 ) IN April, 1963, the appellants received a noti



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top