SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Cal) 7

D.N.SINHA, A.K.MUKHERJI
STERLING INVESTMENT CORPORATION PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SUSHILA DEVI RAMPURIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.MITTER, M.L.Mehta, R.C.DE, S.SEN, SOMNATH CHATTERJEE

ARUN K. MUKHERJEA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is from a judgment and order dated June 14, 1962 passed by Ray, J. by which Ray, j. dismissed an application of the appellant for revocation of leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent which had been granted to the plaintiff in the instant suit. The facts of the case are briefly as follows.

( 2 ) THE appellant is u private limited company with its registered office at Bombay and if* a producer of cinematographic films and motion pictures. The appellant produced u film called "mughal-E-Azam". On or about June 19, 1959 there was an agreement in writing by and between the appellant and a firm named Messrs. Chitrabani by which the appellant appointed the said Messrs, Chitrabani as the sole distributor of the said film for a territory which is known to the film trade as Bombay circuit. Under that agreement the said Messrs. Chitrabani were given license for sole and exclusive exhibition, distribution and exploitation of the picture in the said Bombay circuit. Messrs. Chitrabani (described as "distributors' in the said agreement) agreed to give to the appellant who has been described as "principals" in the agreement. as and by way ol minimum gu













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top