SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 91

P.C.MALLICK
GHASILAL TODI – Appellant
Versus
BISWANATH KERWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajit Sarkar, Monotosh Mukherjee

P. C. MALLICK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application challenging the validity of an arbitration proceeding and the award made thereunder. It is prayed that the award made on May 23, 1962 in the said arbitration proceeding be set aside. It is prayed in the alternative that the appointment of Madanlal Dalmia as sole arbitrator be set aside. There is a third alternative prayer for remitting the award for reconsideration.

( 2 ) SHORTLY the facts relevant for the purpose of this application may now be stated. The petitioners are owners of a rice mill situate at Beliatore in the district of Bankura. On November 16, 1960, they entered into a partnership, agreement with the respondent for carrying on the said business. The respondent under the agreement was required to advance money both by way of capital and loan to the partnership. It is not necessary to set out and consider the other terms of the partnership except Clause 29 which is the arbitration clause. Disputes arose between the parties --each charging the other of having committed breach of the partnership agreement. Thereupon the respondent by his solicitor invoked the arbitration clause, appointed Madanlal Dalmia as the respondent's








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top