SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 237

B. P. SINHA, J. R. MUDHOLKAR, K. SUBBA RAO, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
Hari Shanker Lal – Appellant
Versus
Shairtbhu Nath – Respondent


Advocates:
A.N.GOYAL, GANPAT RAI, S.K.KAPOOR

Judgment

SUBBA RAO, J.: (On behalf of himself, B. P. Sinha C.J.I., and Mudholkar J.) This appeal by certificate raises a question of construction, of R. 3 of the First Schedule to the Arbitration Act, 1940 (10 of 1940) (hereinafter referred to as the Act),

2. The facts material to the question raised may be briefly stated. The appellant and respondents 1 and 2 are brothers. On August 17, 1948, the appellant and respondents 1 and 2 and their mother by a registered deed of agreement referred their dispute regarding the partition of two house in the city of Banaras to two arbitrators, respondents 3 and 4. Within 10 days of the reference, the said arbitrators gave notice to the parties and began to take evidence i.e., they entered on the reference. On July 25, 1949, Rajwanti the mother of the appellant and respondents 1 and 2 died, and the arbitrators did not proceed with the inquiry. On August 31, 1950, i.e., more than one year after the death of Rajwanti, the appellant gave a notice to the arbitrators requesting them to proceed with the reference and give the award at an early date. On October 1, 1950, i.e., within 4 months from the date of the notice, the arbitrators made an award and






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top