SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 3

BANERJEE, D.BASU
MANGALA PROSAD ALIAS MANGALA PROSAD SINGH – Appellant
Versus
V. J. MANERIKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amiya Kumar Mookerji, SAMARENDRA KUMAR DUTT

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner carries on business under the trade name of Hard Sales Agency, at no. 34, Armenian Street, Calcutta. On August 3, 1962, the office and godown of the petitioner was searched by the police and certain tins of dyes, all manufactured in foreign countries, and certain other articles were seized. On the same date the petitioner was arrested by the police, on a charge of retaining stolen properties, and was prosecuted before the Additional Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta. After a long and protracted enquiry by the police, the petitioner was discharged on September 11, 1962. While the police investigation was going on, a Deputy Superintendent of Land Customs applied before the Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate, under Section 180 of the Sea Customs Act, praying that the seized goods be delivered to the Customs Department. The Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate granted the prayer and the Customs Department took possession of the seized goods from the police. The petitioner applied before the Magistrate to recover possession of the goods after his discharge but the Additional Chief Presidency Magistrate refused the prayer.

( 2 ) ON November 17, 196





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top