SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Cal) 47

A.N.RAY
KRISHNA KALI MALLIK – Appellant
Versus
BABULAL SHAW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.MITRA, B.BHATTACHARJI, M.M.SEN, S.MUKHERJEE

A. N. RAY, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff instituted this suit for a mandatory injunction commanding the defendants to demolish or pull down the constructions indicated by the hatched portions in the plan annexed to the plaint and coloured red and a declaration, if necessary, that the constructions indicated by the hatched portions in the plan coloured red, are illegal, a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants or their agents and servants from constructing the third storey or any portion thereof without complying with the side space and back space rules, being rules Nos. 32 and 30 of Schedule XVI of the Calcutta Municipal Act of 1951 and further reliefs.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff is the owner of premises. No. 177 Cornwallis Street. The defendants are owners of premises No. 178, Cornwallis Street. The premises No. 178 Cornwallis Street stands to the immediate south of premises No. 177 Cornwallis Street. The plaintiff's premises is partly five storied and partly six storied. The defendant's house is a two storied building. Prior to 1958, it is alleged that, there existed at 178 Cornwallis Street a two storied building of low height and that in the year 1958 the said two storied building


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top