SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Cal) 78

B.N.BANERJEE
TULSIDAS PAUL – Appellant
Versus
SECOND LABOUR COURT OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


B. N. BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner firm carry on business as manufacturers of umbrellas, at No. 252-C, Chittaranjan Avenue, in the town of Calcutta. The demand for umbrellas being of seasonal nature the work of umbrella manufacture is carried on in the factory of the petitioner firm for about seven months in the year, namely from the month of January or February to August. It is stated in the petition, that at the beginning of each manufacturing season workmen are engaged in the factory on the basis of estimated seasonal requirement, on piece rate basis. Excepting a skeleton staff, the factory of, the petitioner firm does not, it is stated, employ any workmen during off-season.

( 2 ) THIS version is not, however, admitted in the affidavit-in-opposition affirmed on behalf of respondents Nos. 2, 3 and 6 to 13 (namely, the All India Chhata Karkhana Mazdur Union, workmen of the petitioner said to be represented by All India Chhata Karkhana Mazdur Union and certain dismissed workmen, hereinafter referred to ). It is therein stated that the ending of the manufacturing season does not out an end to the contract of service and all workmen, except those temporarily employed in the pr






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top