SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Cal) 14

P.B.MUKHARJI, C.N.LAIK
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
ASSOCIATED CLOTHIERS LTD. , CALCUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Debi Prasad Pal

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IN this Reference under Section 66 (2) of the Income-tax Act the High Court directed the Tribunal to refer the following question for its decision:"whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rupees forty thousand two hundred and forty seven could not be deemed to be profits of the assessee company under second proviso to Section 10 (2) (vii) of the Indian Income-tax Act?"

( 2 ) THE assessee is Associated Clothiers Ltd. of 21, Old Court House Street, Calcutta and is a private Limited Company. It was formerly carrying on business as clothiers and dealers under the name of M/s Phelps and Company Limited. M/s Phelps and Co. started as a partnership on the 5th February, 1912 and was later converted into a Limited Company on the 30th September, 1939, On the 21st March, 1952 the name of Phelps and Company Ltd. was changed into the name of the assessee. But on the same day a new Phelps and Co. was incorporated. On this 21st March, 1952, there was an agreement between the Associated Clothiers Ltd. , the assessee, described as having its registered office at 5, Mission Row Extension, Calcutta and calle






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top