P.B.MUKHARJI, C.N.LAIK
KOOKA SIDHWA AND CO. , CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a consolidated Reference under Section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act at the instance of the assesses in respect of three assessment years 1944-45, 1945-46 and 1946-47 where the following question has been referred:"whether on the facts and in the circumstances at-the case the Tribunal was justified In not admitting the appeals filed by the assesses in respect of the revision of its assessments for the assessment year 1944-45, 1945-46 and 1946-47". In other words, whether the order passed by the Income-tax Officer revising the original assessment as directed--by the Appellate Tribunal would partake the character of procedural law only I. e. whether the appellant had no substantive right to prefer the appeal under Section 30 of the Act
( 2 ) THE facts material for the purpose of the reference are: The applicant-firm Messrs. Kooka Sidhwa and Company, Calcutta, is the Managing Agent of limited concern, viz. , the Globe Theatres Ltd. , Calcutta. Under the terms of the agreement of the Managing Agency, Kooks Company was entitled to a remuneration of Rs. 1,000/- per month and 10% of the net profits. On August 17, 1942, the Globe Theatres Ltd. passed a special
Melaram and Sons v. Commr. of Income-tax, Punjab
Rajendra Nath v. Commr. of Income-tax
C.A.Abraham v. Income-tax Officer, Kottayam
Income-tax Officer V Circle Madras v. S.K.Habibullah
Ramaswami Chettiar v. Commr. of Income-tax, Madras
REFERRED TO : Commr. of Income-tax, Madras v. Arunachalam Chettiar
Badridas Daga v. Commr. of Income-tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.