SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Cal) 39

P.B.MUKHARJI, C.N.LAIK
KOOKA SIDHWA AND CO. , CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.PAL, D.P.Pal, E.R.MAYOR

C. N. LAIK, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a consolidated Reference under Section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act at the instance of the assesses in respect of three assessment years 1944-45, 1945-46 and 1946-47 where the following question has been referred:"whether on the facts and in the circumstances at-the case the Tribunal was justified In not admitting the appeals filed by the assesses in respect of the revision of its assessments for the assessment year 1944-45, 1945-46 and 1946-47". In other words, whether the order passed by the Income-tax Officer revising the original assessment as directed--by the Appellate Tribunal would partake the character of procedural law only I. e. whether the appellant had no substantive right to prefer the appeal under Section 30 of the Act

( 2 ) THE facts material for the purpose of the reference are: The applicant-firm Messrs. Kooka Sidhwa and Company, Calcutta, is the Managing Agent of limited concern, viz. , the Globe Theatres Ltd. , Calcutta. Under the terms of the agreement of the Managing Agency, Kooks Company was entitled to a remuneration of Rs. 1,000/- per month and 10% of the net profits. On August 17, 1942, the Globe Theatres Ltd. passed a special































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top