SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Cal) 168

R.S.BACHAWAT, D.N.SINHA, P.N.MUKHERJEE
TAILORS PRIYA, A FIRM – Appellant
Versus
GULABCHAND DANRAJ, A FIRM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Anil Kumar Sen, GAGANENDRA KRISHNA DEB, Sudhanshu Bhusan Sen

BACHAWAT, J.

( 1 ) ON August 30, 1961, the plaintiff instituted a suit in the City Civil Court, Calcutta under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure claiming a decree on a dishonoured cheque dated 29th July, 1961 drawn by the defendant and payable to the plaintiff or order. The cheque is crossed generally and is marked with the words "a/c payee only. " Those words are written within the transverse lines of the crossing. The writ of summons in the prescribed form was served on the defendant on September 19. On September 25the defendant filed a petition praying for extension of the time to make an application for leave to appear and to defend the suit. The petition was rejected by the Registrar on September 28. On October 6, the defendant filed another petition asking for leave to appear and to defend the suit. By an order dated October 7, 1961 the Judge dismissed this petition. The defendant has moved this Court in revision against this order and has obtained a rule. The revision case has been referred to this Bench under Chapter II Rule 1 proviso (ii) of the Appellate Side Rules.

( 2 ) MR. Sen for the defendant contended that the cheque dated the 29th July, 1961 is not a ne
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top