SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Cal) 104

P.B.MUKHARJI
AMBALAL PURUSOTTAMDAS AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
JAWARLAL PURUSOTTAM DAVE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M.SEN, S.C.DEBEY

P. B. MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by the defendants for leave to appear and defend this suit which has been instituted by the plaintiff under Order 37, Civil P. C. The summons was taken out on 30-3-1953.

( 2 ) THE suit is one for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 19,129-12-6 as principal and Rs. 500/- as interest due on a promissory note dated 17-4-1952.

( 3 ) MANY interesting and important points have been raised in this application. The defendants contend first that Order 37, Civil P. C. is 'ultra vires' the Constitution and is against the principle of natural justice. The next point taken is that the promissory note in this case is not really a promissory note because it is endorsed on an account book of the plaintiff and also because the language is not really the language of the usual promissory note. On merits, however, there is very little defence except some agreement is pleaded in the presence of one Doyalal Dave No. 24/25, Rup Chand Roy Street, Calcutta, by which it is said that the. defendant firm would pay the sum of Rs. 16,129-12-6, by ten annual instalments. It is said that the defendants carry on business as members of a joint Hindu family under the name






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top