SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Cal) 28

G.K.MITTER, S.C.LAHIRI, R.S.BACHAWAT
MANICKCHAND DURGAPRASAD – Appellant
Versus
PRATABMULL RAMESWAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
E.R.Meyer, G.CHAKRABORTY, G.P.KAR, R.C.DE, SALIL K.ROY CHOWDHURY

LAHIRI, C. J.

( 1 ) THE facts leading up to this Reference are as follows. The respondent, Pratabmull Rameswar, filed a suit against the petitioner for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 87,000/- as damages under the circumstances stated in the plaint. The suit was dismissed by a single Judge sitting on the Original Side by a Judgment dated January 25, 1957. Against that decree the respondent tiled an appeal which was heard by a Division Bench. By a judgment dated February 19, 1960, the Division Bench reversed the judgment and decree of the Court of first instance and decreed the respondent's suit. Against the decree of the Division Bench the petitioner filed an application for a certificate under Article 133 of the Constitution, and by an order dated September 12, 1960, a certificate was granted in favour of the petitioner. Under Order XLV, Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure the petitioner was required to furnish security within a period of six weeks from the date of the certificate or within a period of ninety days from the date of the decree complained of, which period could be extended by the Court for a maximum period of sixty days, whichever was the later date. As the decree co
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top