( 1 ) THIS revisional application is directed against the forfeiture of the bond executed by the petitioner Sailesh Chandra Chakravarty as the surety for producing certain accused in Court. The accused Salimuddin, Sultan and three others were arrested by the police, and on 16-7-59 under the provisions of Section 495 Cri. p. C. they were released on bail by the officer-in-Charge of Dinhata Police Station, who accepted a bail bond executed by the petitioner Sailesh Chandra Chakravarty as surety. Sailesh Chandra Chakraborty undertook to produce each of the accused In the Court of the S. D. O. at Dinhata and in default undertook to pay Rs. 200/- in respect of each accused. Two of the accused, namely, Sultan and Saiimuddin absconded, and the surety Sailesh Chandra Chakravarty was directed to produce them before the S. D. O. , Dinhata, but failed to do so. Thereupon the S. D. O. Dinhata, called upon the petitioner to show cause why the bail bond should not be forfeited. After hearing the. petitioner, the S. D. O. by an order dated 4-4-60 forfeited the bail bond and directed the petitioner to deposit in Court the full amount of Rs. 400/- in respect of the two accused. There