SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(SC) 184

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI
Ram Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
D.P.UMYAL, M.V.GOSWAMY, SHIV PUJAN SINGH

Judgment

O. CHINAPPA REDDY J.:- Jorma who was convicted by the learned Sessions Judge Dehradun under Section 302 Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life, was directed by the High Court of Allahabad to be released on bail on furnishing bail to the satisfaction of the District Magistrate, Dehradun. The District Magistrate (Judicial) Dehradun ordered Jorma to execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 5,000/- and to furnish two sureties in a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each. Ram Lal the present appellant was one of the persons who executed a surety bond. Another, Abdul Jabbar, also executed a surety bond. By some oversight no personal bond was taken from Jorma nor was his signature taken on the reverse of the bonds executed by the two sureties as appears to have been usually done. Jorma jumped bail and the sureties were unable to produce him when required to do so. The Distirct Magistrate, Dehradun, therefore, forfeited the surety bonds and issued a warrant of attachment against the sureties under S. 514 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898. The appellant preferred an appeal to the High Court of Allahabad against the order of forfeiture. Before the High Court it was su
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top