B.K.GUHA, B.N.BANERJEE, P.N.MUKHERJEE
SETHIA PROPERTIES, A DISSOLVED FIRM – Appellant
Versus
T. R. BHAVNANI – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a reference made to a Special Division Bench, under the second proviso to Rule 1, Chapter II of the High Court Appellate Side Rules. The particular question of law referred for determination is : "whether Rule 9 of the West Bengal Premises Rent Control Rules 1950 is ultra vires. "
( 2 ) RULE 9 above referred to is quoted below :"9. In making inquiries under the Act, the Controller, the Chief Judge of the Court of Small Causes, Calcutta, the District Judge or the Judicial Officer to whom the case may be transferred under the provision of Clause (a) or Clause (b) of Sub-section (1) of Section 32 shall follow, as nearly as may be, the procedure laid down in the Code of Civil Procedure, 3,908, for the regular trial of suits, the substance only of the evidence being recorded as in unappealable cases and shall record in brief 'the reasons for his findings. "
( 3 ) I need refer to the facts of the case briefly, so as to understand how this reference came to be made.
( 4 ) THE petitioner Sethia Properties is the owner of premises No. 19 Doy Street, Calcutta. Suite No. 7, in the said premises, originally used to be occupied by one C. A. Sarkies, as a month
REFERRED TO : D.K.Sen Gupta v. Ananta Lal
Pulin Krishna Paul v. Sishupati Chakravarty
Sewpujan Rai Indrasan Rai Ltd. v. The Collector of Customs
Jhabermal Dudhwalla v. Govindram
Harishankar Bagla v. State of Madhya Pradesh
T.B.Ibrahim v. Regional Transport AUthority, Tanjore
Dwarka Prosad Laxmi Narain v. State of U.P.
Raj Narain Singh v. Chairman, Patna Administrative Committee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.