SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 17

B.K.GUHA
DEO KARAN AGARWALLA – Appellant
Versus
SATYENDRA GHOSAUL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.Gupta, ASUTOSH GANGULY, B.B.DAS GUPTA, NALINI RANJAN BHATTACHARJI, P.N.MITTER

B. K. GUHA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 115 of the Code o Civil Procedure at the instance of one Deo Karan Agarwalla and it is directed against an order passed by a Munsif of Alipore in respect of a petition under Order 21 Rule 97 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the decree-holders.

( 2 ) BEFORE going into the merits of the case it is necessary to state certain facts. Opposite parties 1 to 19 are the shebaits of a debutter estate known as Bhukailash Raj Estate. Many years ago the predecessors of Satyadhan Ghosal and others are stated to have taken settlement of the suit lands from the shebaits of the debutter estate. Later on a portion o this land was surrendered and the remaining six bighas and thirteen cottahs continued to be possessed by Satyadhan Ghosal and his co-sharers. It is the case of the petitioner that Satya Dhan Ghosal and his co-sharers are settled raiyats as contemplated by the Bengal Tenancy Act in respect of the said plot of land which was settled by them in September 1939 with one Rasananda Jana. Title Suit No. 463 of 1945 was instituted by Satyadhan Ghosal against Rasananda Jana and on the 12th January 1948 a decree was passed therein against






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top