SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 150

N.K.SEN, D.N.DAS GUPTA
ABDUL RAUF – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.ROY, BALAI CHANDRA ROY, KISHORE MUKHARJI

D. N. DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revisional application for setting aside the conviction and sentence of the petitioner under by-law No. 25 of the by-laws made under Section 245 of the Bengal Municipal Act, 1932, (Bengal Act XV of 1932 ). The case for the prosecution is that the petitioner who owns a house by the side of a public lane within the Municipality of Asansol constructed a wall on the said lane by encroaching upon it. He did not remove the wall in spite of the requisition of the Chairman on behalf of the Commissioners of the Municipality made under the provision of Section 240 (l) (b) of the said Act.

( 2 ) THE petitioner denied that he had made any encroachment.

( 3 ) THE petitioner was found not guilty of the offence under Section 240 (1) (b)/500 of the Act and acquitted by the learned Magistrate who tried him. But the petitioner was found guilty under by-law No. 25, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10/- in default to undergo simple imprison-ment for two days.

( 4 ) SECTION 245 of the Bengal Municipal Act provides:"the Commissioners at a meeting may make by-laws - (a) to regulate or prohibit any description of. traffic on public street or on approache









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top