SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Cal) 214

B.K.GUHA, B.N.BANERJEE
KALIPADA GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
TULSIDAS DUTT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ATUL CHANDRA GUPTA, HARIDAS GUPTA, Hemanta Krishna Mitra, J.K.Sen Gupta, Narottam Chatterjee

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) ONE Girish Chandra Dutt was the owner of certain properties, which were made the subject of a suit for partition. Out of an application, under Section 4 of the Partition Act, made in the aforesaid suit for partition, the present appeal arises.

( 2 ) GIRISH was succeeded by three sons, namely Tulsidas (the plaintiff respondent No. 1), Bonbehari (defendant No. 1, who is the respondent No. 2) and Satya Sadhan (father and husband respectively of defendants Nos. 2 and 3, who are respondents Nos. 3 and 4 ). Sankar Charan (defendant No. 4, who is respondent No. 5) is the son of the plaintiff. He was made a party to the partition suit in his capacity as the purchaser of a certain share in some of the properties included in the partition suit. Kali-pada (defendant No. 5, who is the appellant) is the transferee of the share of defendants Nos. 2 and 3 (respondents No. 3 and 4) in some out of the several properties, which were included in the suit for partition.

( 3 ) THE property in dispute is C. S. Plot No. 1596, recorded in Khatian No. 183 of Mouza Khato-ra. In the settlement record the land is recorded as Udbasu land, measuring 19 cent. The said plot was described in























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top