CHAKRABARTI, SARMA SARKAR
R. K. DAS AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THE assessee at whose instance this Reference under Section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act has been made is a firm. In maintaining its accounts, it observes the calendar year. Admittedly during the year 1945, the assessee earned a taxable income, but it did not file any return in response to the general notice issued under Section 22 (1) of the Act, nor did the Income-tax Officer issue any notice to the assessee under Section 22 (2 ). By the time he discovered the omission, the assessment year which was the year 1946-47 had already expired. At that stage, therefore, he could issue a notice only under Section 34 of the Act and he did so on 23-8-1948. As Section 34 stood at that time no sanction of the Commissioner for the issue of a notice under the section was required and consequently none was obtained.
( 2 ) IT appears that the assessee did not file a return in compliance with the notice. Instead a partner appeared before the Income-tax Officer on 8-11-1948, and asked for time till the end of January. 1949, on the ground that the books of the business for the relevant year had not yet been closed. The Income-tax Officer was not prepared to allow the time
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.