SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Cal) 160

GUHA RAY, J.P.MITTER
RUSTOM ALI MOLLA – Appellant
Versus
BATA SHOE CO. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.C.GUPTA, C.C.GANGULY, H.N.SANYAL, NONI COOMAR CHAKRAVARTI, PRAFULLA KUMAR CHATTERJEE

MITTER, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is from an order of the District Judge of 24 Parganas, granting an interlocutory injunction against the defendants in a suit for infringement of a Trade Mark and for passing off.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs are well-known manufacturers of footwear and other leather and rubber goods. It is said that they also manufacture socks and hosiery. They are the owners of the Trade Mark "bata" ia respect of "canvas rubber leather shoes, rubber monolith (footwear), rubber heels, rubber soles, rubber plates (for shoes), leather soles, half-soles, heels, wooden heels socks and hosiery. " This Trade Mark was registered on July 8, 1946.

( 3 ) DEFENDANT No. 5 (one of the appellants herein) claims to have been using the said mark or name ''bata" in respect of lungis. It is said that in August, 1953, he applied before the Registrar of Trade Marks, Bombay, for registering a Trade Mark under the name "bata Lungis".

( 4 ) IT is common case that the plaintiffs have not so far manufactured lungis or handkerchiefs. According to them, they first learnt in November, 1953, that defendant No. 5 was using the said mark "bata" in respect of lungis by inscribing the said mark on a label
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top