SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 79

DAS, GUHA RAY
BHABATOSH GHATTAK – Appellant
Versus
JOY KUMARI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL KUMAR DAS GUPTA, BINAYAK NATH BANERJEE, N.C.SEN GUPTA, Susil Kumar Biswas, URUKRAMDAS CHAKRAVARTHY

DAS J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the defendant under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the decision of a learned Judge of this Court dated the 15th of June, 1953.

( 2 ) THE plaintiffs were admittedly tenants under the defendant in respect of premises No. 115, Lansdowne Road, Calcutta. On the 5th of July, 1947, a notice determining the tenancy was served on the plaintiffs. Thereupon the defendant who is the landlord instituted a suit for ejectment, being Title Suit No. 117 of 1947. The suit was decreed by the trial court on the 13th of December, 1950. The tenants preferred an appeal. The appeal was dismissed by the lower appellate court on the 12th of July, 1951. It appears that on the 14th of July, 1951 and on subsequent dates, namely 17th September, 1951; 5th November, 1951; 10th November, 1951; 27th December, 1951; 30th January, 1952 and 3rd March, 1952 the plaintiffs, that is, the tenants remitted by money order certain sums as rent payable by them in respect of premises No. 115, Lansdowne Road, Calcutta. In the coupon there is an endorsement to the effect "please acknowledge the receipt of rent for holding No. 115, Lansdowne Road, Calcutta" for the months in Question.









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top