SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 45

LAHIRI, MITTER
PANCHANAN GHOSE – Appellant
Versus
HARIDAS BANERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BEJOY BHOSE, DHRUB MUKHERJI, NALIN CHANDRA BANERJI

MITTER, J.

( 1 ) THIS second appeal was referred to a Division Bench by a learned single Judge and is thus before us.

( 2 ) THE principal question which falls to be considered in the appeal is whether acceptance of rent due after the expiry of a notice to quit constitutes a waiver of the said notice by the landlord.

( 3 ) THE appellant was a tenant under the respondent in respect of a portion of premises No. 4, Townshend Road, Calcutta. By a notice to quit, dated 4-3-1948, the respondent landlord purported to terminate the appellant's tenancy on 31st March. This was followed by a suit for ejectment instituted on 3-4-1948. Thereafter, for several months the appellant deposited current rent with the Rent Controller, but between January, 1949, and October, 1950, while the suit was still pending, he remitted to the respondent by postal money orders divers-sums by way of rent for the period commencing January 1949. The suit for possession, which was governed by the provisions of Calcutta Rent Ordinance, 1946, was decreed on 11-12-1951.

( 4 ) AS the appellant's written statement was filed long before the said acceptance of rent by the respondent, no specific case of waiver was pleade














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top