SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1954 Supreme(Cal) 11

R.P.MOOKERJEE, RENUPADA MUKHERJEE
SREE ISWAR DAMODAR JEW – Appellant
Versus
BEJOY KRISHNA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abinas Chandra Ghose, Biraj Mohan Roy, Purnendu Sekhar Basu, SYAMADAS BHATTACHARYA

RENUPADA MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the defendant and it arises out of a suit instituted by one Ram Rakhal Ghosh as 'sebait' of three Deities for a declaration that the two items of properties described in schedules Ka and Kha of the plaint are 'debottar' properties and are not liable to be attached or sold in execution of a personal decree against the above 'sebait'.

( 2 ) THE Trial Court decreed the plaintiff's suit in so far as it related to the property of Kha schedule of the plaint, but dismissed the claim in respect of the property of schedule Ka. The defendant has preferred this appeal from the above judgment and decree of the Trial Court. No cross objection has been filed by the plaintiffs in respect of the portion of the claim dismissed by the Trial Court.

( 3 ) THE facts which have given rise to the present suit are almost undisputed and the decision of the suit turns mainly on a question of law. The defendant appellant obtained a personal decree against Ram Rakhal Ghose, the 'sebait' of the respondent Deities in Title Suit No. 45 of 1935 of the third court of the Subordinate Judge of Alipur. The decree was put to execution, and the interest of Ram Rakhal












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top