SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Cal) 66

P.N.MUKHERJEE, DAS GUPTA
AJIT KUMAR SEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.CHAUDHARY, S.M.BOSE

DAS GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is by two unsuccessful applicants for writs of Mandamus and Prohibition. Their purpose in asking the Court to issue these writs was to ensure that the general election of the Calcutta Corporation which has been fixed to be held on 27-3-1952, should not be held on that date and further that the election should be held on some other date to be fixed by the Government of West Bengal in accordance with law.

( 2 ) THE Corporation of Calcutta as constituted under the Calcutta Municipal Act of 1923 was superseded by an order passed under the Corporation of Calcutta (Temporary Supersession) Act of 1948 (which will be referred to hereafter for convenience as the Supersession Act), which Act was originally in force up to 31-3-1949, but by subsequest extensions is now in force up to 31-3-1952. Fresh orders superseding the Corporation of Calcutta were passed from time to time, as a result of which the Corporation of Calcutta remain superseded up to 31-3-1952. Two of the main consequences which follow on such an order being made under Section 3 are, as laid down in Section 4 of the Supersession Act, that"all the Councillors and Aldermen constituting the Corpora































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top