SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1951 Supreme(Cal) 267

BANERJEE
GANESHMULL SURANA – Appellant
Versus
NAGRAJ SURANA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASOKE SEN, H.N.SANYAL

BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for setting aside abatement (if any) of the suit and substitution of the petitioner in place of the deceased Ganeshmull Surana who filed the suit for self and as the Karta of a Mitakshara joint family carrying on a joint family business in the name and style of Messrs. Ganeshmull Nimchand, against defendant Nagraj Surana on (inter alia) the following allegations: Ganeshmull Surana at all material times was the Karta of the joint family and for the benefit of the family carried on a joint family business which acted as a commission agent of the defendant; that there were various transactions between the parties, and a sum of Rs. 10,887/7/-including interest became due which the defendant in spite of demand did not pay.

( 2 ) THE suit was filed in 1947. Ganeshmull died on 23-12-1949, and the Notice of Motion of this application was taken out on 1-5-1950.

( 3 ) FROM the dates it is clear that the application is out of time, Mr. H. N. Sanyal who appears on behalf of the petitioner has conceded that the petition does not disclose sufficient grounds for enlargement of the time. But he has raised an interesting question. He contends that the su






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top