SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Cal) 447

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA
JAMES FINLAY AND CO. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Debi Pal, M.SEAL, P.MAJUMDAR, S.SEN

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference Under Section 256 (2) of the I. T. Act, 1961, the following questions have been referred to this court :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs. 8,264 was includible in the assessment for the assessment year 1970-71, as income of the previous year ended December 31, 1969 ?

( 2 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs. 55,920 was includible in the assessment for the assessment year 1970-71, as income of the previous year ended December 31, 1969 ?" 2. This reference relates to the assessment year 1970-71. The assessee is a United Kingdom company which carries on business in India through its branches at Calcutta and Bombay. The Calcutta branch acts as the agents for various tea and steamer companies incorporated outside India, as also for other overseas principals. The Bombay branch acts as agents for Lloyds. Both the branches deal in sundry electrical and other goods. The books of account of both the branches in India are closed on 31st December. The assessment year 1970-71, with which



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top