SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 234

High Court Of Calcutta
SABYASACHI MUKHERJI
NATIONAL HOTEL AND DILKUSHA CABIN - Appellant
Versus
INCOME-TAX OFFICER, "A" WARD - Respondent
Civil Rule 1203 (W)  Of  1972
Decided On : 08/08/1975

Advocates Appeared:
L.K.CHATTERJI, Nanda Lal Pal, S.N.DUTTA

Under Section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, interest for late filing of returns could not be charged in cases where the assessee had not applied for an extension of time, no extension was granted, and no return was filed before the making of the assessment.

Headnote:

INCOME TAX - SECTION 139 - INTEREST ON LATE FILING OF RETURNS - NO INTEREST CHARGEABLE WHERE NO RETURN FILED AND NO EXTENSION OF TIME GRANTED.

Fact of the Case:

The assessee, National Hotel, failed to file returns for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69. The Income-tax Officer completed the assessments under Section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and levied interest for late filing of returns under Section 139.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that, prior to the amendment of Section 139 with effect from 1st April 1972, interest could not be charged in the case of an assessee who had not filed the return prior to the assessment and to whom no extension of time had been granted by the Income-tax Officer on an application made.

Issues: Whether interest can be charged under Section 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in a case where the assessee had not applied for extension of time, no extension of time was granted, and no return was filed before the making of the assessment.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 139(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and held that Clause (iii) of the proviso to the subsection, which allowed for the charging of interest, was applicable only in cases where the Income-tax Officer extended the time for furnishing the return on an application made by the assessee. Since the assessee in the instant case had not applied for an extension of time and no extension was granted, the court held that interest could not be charged.

Final Decision: The court quashed the assessment order to the extent it imposed interest for non-submission of returns and issued a writ of certiorari and mandamus accordingly.

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application challenging the assessment made under Section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69. The assessee is National Hotel which runs a popular eating house in Calcutta known as Dilkusha Cabin. The assessee was represented by a receiver appointed by this court in Suit No. 890 of 1969. After the receiver took possession he found that no return had been filed for the assessment years 1967-68 and 1968-69. The receiver had received a notice under Section 139 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. As he was unaware of the true position he applied for time to enable him to deal with the notice. The receiver, thereafter, found that no return had been filed nor any application had been made for extension of time to submit return. The receiver also did not file any application for extension of time to file return. These facts are not in dispute. Thereupon, the petitioner appeared on the 7th of October, 1971, before the respondent, Income-tax Officer, and the Income-tax Officer on the 15th of October, 1971, completed the assessments for the aforesaid two years under Section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the best of his judgment. In the said assessment orders, which are annexures to this petition, it has been stated by the Income-tax Officer that no return had been filed and no application was made for extension of time for filing returns. From the said assessment orders and demand notices it appeared that interest as contemplated under Section 139 for late filing of the returns had been charged. The petitioner contends that the respondent, Income-tax Officer, was not entitled to levy or impose any interest undersection 139 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for late filing of returns. The relevant provision of Section 139 (1) of the Act at the material time stood as follows:"139. Return of income.-- (1) Every person, if his total income or the total income of any other person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act during the previous year exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, shall furnish a return of his income or the income of such other person during the previous year in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner and setting forth such other particulars as may be prescribed-- (a) in the case of every person whose total income, or the total income of any other person in respect of which he is assessable under this Act, includes any income from business or profession, before the expiry of six months from the end of the previous year or where there is more than one previous year, from the end of the previous year which expired last before the commencement of the assessment year, or before the 30th day of June of the assessment year, whichever is later ; (b) in the case of every other person, before the 30th day of June of the assessment year: provided that, on an application made in the prescribed manner, the Income-tax Officer, may in his discretion, extend the date for furnishing the return-- (i) in the case of any person whose total income includes any income from business or profession the previous year in respect of which expired on or before the 31st day of December of the year immediately preceding the assessment year, and in the case of any person referred to in Clause (b), up to a period not extending beyond the 30th day of September of the assessment year without charging any interest; (ii) in the case of any person whose total income includes any income from business or profession the previous year in respect of which expired after the 31st day of December of the year immediately preceding the assessment year, up to the 31st day of December of the assessment year without charging any interest; and (iii) up to any period falling beyond the dates mentioned in Clauses (i) and (ii) in which case, interest at nine per cent. per annum shall be payable from the 1st day of October or 1st day of Jan



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top