SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 42

DEB, R.N.PYNE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT COMPANY LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SEN GUPTA, B.L.PAL, DILIP DHAR, R.N.BAJORIA

DEB, J.

( 1 ) THE Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred, under Section 66 (1) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the following question of law:"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the factory at Cossipore can be said to have been formed by the reconstruction of business already in existence or by the transfer to it of machinery and plant previously used in any other business so as to fall within the scope of Section 15c (2) (i) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. "

( 2 ) IN this reference we are concerned with the assessment years 1957-58 to 1961-62. The relevant year ended on 31st October, preceding the relevant assessment years. The assessee was incorporated as a public limited company on June 12, 1945. In the same year it took on lease a factory situated at Hazra Road and started manufacturing switch boards, transformers, etc. , and thereafter purchased the said factory in the year 3946 and continued to carry on business therein.

( 3 ) IN 1956 the assessee started a new factory at Cossipore by purchasing new machinery and plant of the value of over Rs. 6 lakhs and started manufacturing therein the same types of goods as were being manufactured in










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top