SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Cal) 270

CHITTATOSH MUKHERJEE, S.K.BHATTACHARYYA
TARAK CHANDRA DHOLEY – Appellant
Versus
SATYANARAIN SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jnan Ranjan Ganguly, MRITUNJOY PALIT

CHITTATOSH MUKHERJEE, S. K. BHATTACHARYYA

( 1 ) THE petitioner in this Rule as plaintiff has instituted a suit in the 2nd Court of Munsif at Serampore against the opposite parties, inter alia, for a declaration of his tenancy rights and/or title to the lands described in Schedule 'ka' and 'kha' of the plaint and for further declaration that the Record of Rights in so far as the same recorded the name of the defendant-opposite party No. 1 as a tenant under the State was wrong and that the rental recorded as Rs. 155/- instead of Rs. 110/- per year in respect of the Schedule lands was wrong and that the R. S. Khatian No. 3706 of 'kha' Schedule so far as it recorded Kundan Orao as a tenant under Kirti Chandra Mukhopadhyay and others instead of under the plaintiff was wrong and that the defendant No. 1 was just a caretaker and had no right, title and interest in the 'kha' Schedule properties and that there had been revocation of the said entrustment. The petitioner has also prayed for an order of permanent injunction for restraining the defendant No. 1 from interfering with his alleged possession in the 'ka' and 'kha' Schedule suit properties.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff-petitioner has averred























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top