SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 11

R.BHATTACHARYYA
MOHIDDIN MOLLA – Appellant
Versus
JITENDRANATH KARMAKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.MOTILAL, BARUN KUMAR CHAUDHARY

R. BHATTACHARYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revisional application has been filed by the defendant of the original suit against an order passed by the learned Munsif on 25-3-1974 rejecting the petitioner's application under Section 4 of the Partition Act. The opposite party is opposing the application.

( 2 ) THE opposite party Jitendra Nath Karamkar filed a suit for partition against the petitioner Mohiuddin Molla and others. There has been a preliminary decree for partition. Thereafter when poceedings were going on for final decree, the petitioner Mohiuddin filed a petition under Section 4 of the Partition Act. The plaintiff opposed and the learned Munsif found that the entire suit property was not the dwelling house of the defendant's family. It has also been held by the learned Munsif that as previously a petition was filed on similar ground and since it was rejected, the subsequent application under Section 4 of the Partition Act was not maintainable. On these grounds the defendant's petition was rejected. Against that order the petitioner has come up before this Court challenging the propriety and validity of the said order.

( 3 ) I have heard Mr. Roy Chowdhury appearing on behalf of the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top