SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Cal) 183

S.C.DEB, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. OF INDIA LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.ROY, AJAY MITTAL, K.RAY, S.C.SEN

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal-I, the Tribunal has been directed under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to send up a statement in respect of the following two questions :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that there was no mistake apparent from the record regarding the allowance of Rs. 61,163 as wealth-tax and that accordingly the order of rectification passed by the Income-tax Officer in respect thereof was not justified in law ? whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the omission to charge interest under Section 18a (7) of the Income-tax Act could not be rectified under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and in deleting the charge of Rs. 7,173. 63 made by the Income-tax Officer ?"

( 2 ) THE facts found or admitted as will appear from the statement of the case and the annexures thereto may briefly be noted.

( 3 ) THE assessee is General Electric Co. of India Ltd. , Calcutta. At the relevant time, that is, during the assessment year 1959-60, the assessee was known as



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top