S.C.DEB, DIPAK KUMAR SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. OF INDIA LTD. – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this reference at the instance of the Commissioner of Income-tax, West Bengal-I, the Tribunal has been directed under Section 256 (2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to send up a statement in respect of the following two questions :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that there was no mistake apparent from the record regarding the allowance of Rs. 61,163 as wealth-tax and that accordingly the order of rectification passed by the Income-tax Officer in respect thereof was not justified in law ? whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the omission to charge interest under Section 18a (7) of the Income-tax Act could not be rectified under Section 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and in deleting the charge of Rs. 7,173. 63 made by the Income-tax Officer ?"
( 2 ) THE facts found or admitted as will appear from the statement of the case and the annexures thereto may briefly be noted.
( 3 ) THE assessee is General Electric Co. of India Ltd. , Calcutta. At the relevant time, that is, during the assessment year 1959-60, the assessee was known as
Travancore Titanium Products Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax
Sankappa v. Income-tax Officer
M.K. Venkatachalam, Income-tax Officer v. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Durga Prasad More
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Mallikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale
S.A.L. Narayan Row v. Ishwarlal Bhagwandas
Government of Andhra Pradesh v. Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.