SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Cal) 18

M.N.RAY
GOURI SANKAR MUKHERJEE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHOLANATH BHATTACHARYA, DIPTI KONA BASU, G.S.SARKAR

M. N. RAY, J.

( 1 ) ON July 19, 1976, a Rule against notices in Annexures "b" and "c" to the petition was issued by this Court whereby suo moto proceedings were initiated under the provisions of the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. The said petition was signed and verified by one Ananda Bhairab Ghose claiming to be the Karmachari and Tadbirkar of the petitioner. All statements in the said petition excepting those made in paragraphs 6 and 11 to 19 were affirmed as true to his knowledge. There has of course been a certificate by the learned Advocate that the said deponent was the authorised Karmachari of the petitioner and was competent to affirm the affidavit and sign the petition on his behalf.

( 2 ) AT the time of issuing the Rule, this Court was pleased to grant an order maintaining status quo as on July 19, 1976 for a period of six weeks, with liberty to the petitioner to apply for extension of the said order on the petition of motion with notice to the Respondents. The petitioner was further directed to file an affidavit of service after communication of the gist of the order as made along with the copy of the petition. Such affidavit of service appears to have been filed








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top