SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 82

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, C.K.BANERJEE
ONDAL INVESTMENTS CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


DIPAK KUMAR SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE Ondal Investments Co. Ltd. , the assessee, has initiated the above reference No. 10 of 1971. The other reference No. 19 of 1971 is at the instance of the CIT, West Bengal-II, Calcutta. In these references this court has directed the Tribunal to draw up a case under Section 256 (2) of the I. T. Act, 1961, and refer the following questions : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in treating the sum of Rs. 1,47,090 or any portion thereof as the income of the assessee ?

( 2 ) WHETHER there is any evidence for the Tribunal to come to the conclusion that Sonepur Coalfields Ltd. was in possession of the coal mines and/or seams in the area referred to in the Tribunal's order ?

( 3 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and particularly in the face of the finding that re-entry into possession by the Ondal Coal Company Ltd. took place pursuant to their letter to Sonepur Coalfields Ltd. , dated the 20th January, 1960, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the assessee was liable to be assessed during the relevant year on the income based upon the minimum royalty contem

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top