SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Cal) 486

DIPAK KUMAR SEN, C.K.BANERJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
KARAM CHAND THAPAR AND BROS. (P. ) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJIT SEN GUPTA, Debi Pal, J.C.SHAH, PRABIR MAJUMDAR

SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE facts and the proceedings leading up to this reference are shortly as follows : In the assessment year 1958-59, the relevant previous year ending on the 31st March, 1958, Messrs. Karam Chand Thapar and Bros. (P.) Ltd , Calcutta, the assessee, filed a return showing an income of Rs. 28,14,601. Subsequently, the assessee filed a revised return showing such income as Rs. 5,42,093. Ultimately, the assessee was assessed on a total income of Rs. 30,08,425. The assessee had paid advance tax under Section 18a of the Indian I. T. Act, 1922, which fell short of 80% of the tax ultimately determined to be payable by the assessee in the regular assessment and the ITO charged a sum of Rs. 50,678. 69 as interest under Section 18a (6) of the said Act.

( 2 ) THE assessee preferred an appeal against the order of assessment on various grounds challenging, inter alia, the following : (a) Disallowance of bad debts. (b) Disallowance of the losses following sale of shares. (c) Addition of amounts as income from undisclosed sources. (d) Disallowance of sums paid as donations and prospecting expenses.

( 3 ) A ground was also taken against imposition of penal interest under Section 18a

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top