S.C.DEB, SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA
A. GASPER – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent
( 1 ) WE are concerned with the following questions in this reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 :" (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee's right of tenancy under the landlords constituted a capital asset within the meaning of Section 2 (14) of the Income-tax Act ? (2) If the answer to question No. (1) is in the affirmative, whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that there was a transfer of the assessee's right of tenancy under the landlords within the meaning of Section 2 (47) of the said Act ? (3) If the answer to question No. (2) is in the affirmative, whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that the sum of Rs. 1,83,201 represented capital gains assessable under Section 45 (1) of the said Act for the assessment year 1967-68 ?"
( 2 ) THE assessment year is 1967-68 for which the previous year ended on 31st March, 1967. The assessee is an individual and derived income practically from all sources including income from sub-letting premises No. 240e,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.