S.P.RAJKHOWA, SUDHANSHU SEKHAR GANGULY
NARESH CHANDRA DAS – Appellant
Versus
GOPAL CHANDRA DAS – Respondent
( 1 ) THE facts leading to the present appeal may be summarised as follows:-admittedly the parties have been running a partnership business in the name and style of Kalpataru Electric and Electronics at Bijpur within the district of North 24-Paraganas. The plaintiff-appellant filed Title Suit No. 534 of 1988 in the Court of 1st Assistant District Judge, Barasat. North 24-Paraganas alleging that another business of the name of 'audio Vision' being run at Kalyani within the district of Nadia was started as the branch of the partnership business at Bijpur with capital supplied from its funds and assets supplied from its stock. The appellant prayed for a declaration in the suit that the business at Kalyani was also partnership business and/ or joint property and business of the parties and consequential reliefs. The contention of the defendant-respondent as per his written statement was that the business at Kalyani was started by him alone with his own money and that it exclusively was his own business separate from the partnership business at Bijpur. He also challenged the maintainability of the suit at Barasat Court since the property in dispute was situated at Kal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.