SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 333

AMULYA KUMAR NANDI
BIMAL SAHOO, SECRETARY, BASUDEBPUR GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL – Appellant
Versus
GOURI RANI PAHARI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.JANA, P.K.PAHARI, S.B.BHUNIYA, S.NAYAK

A. K. NANDI, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 30 of 1989 in the Second Court of Munsif Contai for a declaration that the plaintiff stood first among the candidates interviewed for selection of an assistant teacher for other declaration, permanent injunction, both prohibitory and mandatory.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff alleges that the defendant School sponsored names of some candidates from the Employment Exchange for filling up a vacancy of an assistant teacher in the School. Since the Adhoc Committee of the school resolved to eliminate the plaintiff she had to file a writ being 2538 (W) of 1988. In terms of direction in the writ by the High Court Committee interviewed the candidates including the plaintiff. On an illegal assessment of marks one Tapati Khatua was selected although the plaintiff stood first in the selection. The plaintiff preferred an appeal to the District Inspector of Schools who on the basis of an enquiry report cancelled the panel prepared by the Selection Committee and directed the Secretary of the school to prepare panel afresh with the candidates already interviewed. The defendant school did not prepare a fresh panel on a correct assessment of the marks















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top